Related topics

More Speedometer 3.23 Results for Fusion 1.1 and Executor
Oracle7.3 should be available for SCO OpenServer Release 5 and for SCO UnixWare 2 sometime soon ... with SCO UnixWare 2 running on a 4xPentium Compaq ProLiant 4500 this version of Oracle7 produced a world record TPC-C price/performance rating, and an absolute performance rating that beat many mid-high end RISC

AMD Athlon XP Coming Next Month
Besides, as we found out, the marking will be based on the Pentium 4 performance rating and not on that of Athlon (Thunderbird), as we have initially supposed. So, AMD does have a reason to be quite modestกK As for the notorious XP suffix (which is associated with the recently announced Windows XP from

general Flash BIOS question
Provided support for major accounts on Compaq server/storage/network products and software applications for SCO UNIX, NetWare and Microsoft Windows NT. CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS * Avaya Mosaix System Supervisor certified (2001) * Outstanding performance rating in ‘97/’98 and Compaq Letter of Excellence * Compaq

Windows ME and Athlon
Geert Ost ost.ge...@pi.be be comp os windows Heb hetzelfde probleem gehad met een K6 : lat van 64 Mb bijsteken en modem werkte niet meer er terug .... << Processor 1 >> < Processor(s) > Processor: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions @ 200MHz Co-Processor (FPU): Built-in Type: Standard Performance Rating: PR200

Windows 98 SE shutdown?
For these tests I used netperf (http://www.cup.hp.com/netperf/NetperfPage.html) to avoid any issues with disc I/O. 56KB TCP windows were used, matching the default window size The E25 has a SPECint92 rating of 50.1, and an OLTP performance rating of 80. The E35 has a SPECint92 of 73.1, and OLTP rating of 125.

Is this ok for Performance rating?
Hi all, I have been getting a low cached read/write performance rating on one of my partitions. I use a IBM 7200rpm Udma66 hard drive with a pent III 550 Cpu 128mb The PROMPT command is only relevant in DOS windows. I think ME puts some of these basics in place regardless -- that's where the defaults are set.

Argon in windows
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 16:49:33 GMT, vtai...@gte.net <vtai...@gte.net> wrote: Using the CPUMark99 benchmark program to compare CPU speeds under Windows 98 yields some This means that a 366 is seriously overclocked at 83x3.5 (which works out to a 402 performance rating, probably requiring a Cyrix 400 to achieve.

WinNT vs Win95
When shopping for replacement windows always ask for performance rating info that many major brands have upon request. Look for overall R-Value( not just center of glass) and infiltration rate usually cmf/sq in or sq. ft. Make sure the ratings between mfgrs use similar tests. If brand X tests infiltrtion at 5 MPH

Adding another I/O Card. . to Comm Port 3
Provided support for major accounts on Compaq server/storage/network products and software applications for SCO UNIX, NetWare and Microsoft Windows NT. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics SPECIAL TRAINING, CERTIFICATES AND AWARDS * Outstanding performance rating in ’97, ’98 and letter of

Open source (was RE: Hi!Dear FreeBSD!)
The iCOMP Index 2.0 rating is based on the technical categories that encompass three separate aspects of 32-bit CPU performance: integer, floating-point, .... Adobe Pagemaker* 6.0 Figure 5 and 6 illustrate the SYSmark32 ratings under Windows 95 and Windows NT 4.0 respectively for the Intel Pentium II processor.

Performance Rating
BS82 simNONSPAMMAREBASTARDObu...@tiscali.it it comp os win xp free it enkey "werterxyzt" <werterx...@yahoo.it> ha scritto nel messaggio news:56083321.0409071006.f2d3a5a@posting.google.com... Windows XP SP2 Performance Review http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-237-1.htm Saluti da P4 "You have more to gain

Using the CPUMark99 benchmark to calibrate Cyrix Performance ...
Includes the following information: independent data comparing the performance of Windows NT Server 4.0 and Linux; a price per unit of performance analysis Providing a summary of how Windows NT Server compares with Linux under other customer requirements. New Performance Reviews/Studies Show Windows NT Server

A Fair Review of the EDGE 3D
User Comment: Executor 2.0t/DOS under Windows 95 PR Results (Uses Mac Classic as 1.0): CPU: 28.360 Graphics: 15.314 Disk: 6.198 Math: 38.390 Performance Rating (OLD PR): 21.017 Performance Rating (NEW PR): 14.584 Benchmark Results (Uses Mac Classic as 1.0): KWhetstones: 789.473 108.147 Dhrystones: 12552.301 12.882

Industry Benchmarks Show Windows NT Server 4.0 Outperforms Linux
Has MS ever said what the highest that these scores can be? Are we using a 1-10 scale for instance? If you click on "What do these numbers mean>" you will see that "The base scores currently range from 1 to 5.9." -- Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User Please reply to the newsgroup.

K6/2-400 to 450 test results
In the TPC-C benchmark: Windows 2000 and SQL Server running on a 12-node cluster of Compaq ProLiant 8500s, with a total of 96 processors, delivered the top score of 227079.15 tpmC with a total system cost of $4341603 for a price performance rating of $19.12 per tpmC. Sun's best score, using a 4-node cluster of

What makes an AMD chip 64 bit?
Some advanced users sometimes need to boot, not Windows, but raw seething DOS 7.0. In WinME, that feature is no longer supported. The rationale apparently is that by not supporting it, Microsoft was able to bypass certain processing at boot time (and later at shutdown time), and make the system boot/shutdown a

HELP: switching motherboard, all windows drivers removed (by ...
Fred: A friend of mine just bought a new Gateway PIV system with 256 MB of ram and windows XP. He has ran all the tests at PcPitstop several times, and, the results aren't very good! The very worst thing is the uncached drive performance, it is lower than 1%, I think, about .84%! Also, his video performance is

Windows ME on new Dell System
I couldn't speak of Apache on Windows, because the Apache group itself, until 2.0, didn't recommend it for commercial sites. So how could I give testimony to the use and performance of Apache without considering Unix/Linux? *sigh* Once again, I stated that I didn't see how: a) Apache on NT has been improved in

Windows XP SP2 Performance Review
Yes, I know that there are advantages to Windows, but when I see uniformed Mac bashing, I'll still have to respond. Besides, you need something else to think about than that jerk you work for, right! Actually after all the stink beforehand, the things that came up in the actual performance review weren't even half

Poll: Why do You read this group?
... PCI(32-bit), USB, AGP(32-bit) Fast Windows System: Yes < Special Mainboard Information > Name: KL11 ROM BIOS Ver 1.4 1998/10/02 Unique ID: Processor(s): Intel Celeron 309MHz Processor(s) Type: Original OEM Performance Rating: PR371 (estimated) Pentium Performance Rating: P371 (estimated) Co-Processor(s):